Skip to main content
Log in

Acceptance and importance of clinical pharmacists’ LIMM-based recommendations

  • Short Research Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of the clinical pharmacy service in a Swedish hospital according to the Lund Integrated Medicine Management (LIMM) model, in terms of the acceptance and clinical significance of the recommendations made by clinical pharmacists. Method The clinical significance of the recommendations made by clinical pharmacists was assessed for a random sample of inpatients receiving the clinical pharmacy service in 2007. Two independent physicians retrospectively ranked the recommendations emerging from errors in the patients’ current medication list and actual drug-related problems according to Hatoum, with rankings ranging between 1 (adverse significance) and 6 (extremely significant). Results The random sample comprised 132 patients (out of 800 receiving the service). The clinical significance of 197 recommendations was assessed. The physicians accepted and implemented 178 (90%) of the clinical pharmacists’ recommendations. Most of these recommendations, 170 (83%), were ranked 3 (somewhat significant) or higher. Conclusion This study provides further evidence of the quality of the LIMM model and confirms that the inclusion of clinical pharmacists in a multi-professional team can improve drug therapy for inpatients. The very high level of acceptance by the physicians of the pharmacists’ recommendations further demonstrates the effectiveness of the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hellstrom LM, Bondesson A, Hoglund P, Midlov P, Holmdahl L, Rickhag E, et al. Impact of the Lund Integrated Medicines Management (LIMM) model on medication appropriateness and drug-related hospital revisits. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(7):741–52. doi:10.1007/s00228-010-0982-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scullin C, Scott MG, Hogg A, McElnay JC. An innovative approach to integrated medicines management. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13(5):781–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00753.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hatoum HT, Hutchinson RA, Witte KW, Newby GP. Evaluation of the contribution of clinical pharmacists: inpatient care and cost reduction. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988;22:252–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee J, McPherson ML. Outcomes of recommendations by hospice pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63:2235–9. doi:10.2146/ajhp060143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Overhage JM, Lukes A. Practical, reliable, comprehensive method for characterizing pharmacists’ clinical activities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:2444–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosma L, Jansman FG, Franken AM, Harting JW, Van den Bemt PM. Evaluation of pharmacist clinical interventions in a Dutch hospital setting. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:31–8. doi:10.1007/s11096-007-9136-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sorensen L, Grobler MP, Roberts MS. Development of a quality use of medicines coding system to rate clinical pharmacists’ medication review recommendations. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25:212–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. Pharmaceutical care practice. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen TF, Neto A. Exploring elements of interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and physicians in medication review. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29:574–6. doi:10.1007/s11096-007-9130-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The assistance of Kristin Holmqvist and Nedal Ahmad, pharmacy students, who classified a large number of the drug-related problems and medication discrepancies, is acknowledged. Also, this study would not have been possible without the dedication and commitment of the ward staff.

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Åsa Bondesson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bondesson, Å., Holmdahl, L., Midlöv, P. et al. Acceptance and importance of clinical pharmacists’ LIMM-based recommendations. Int J Clin Pharm 34, 272–276 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9609-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9609-3

Keywords

Navigation