Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
In the 20th century, Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm-D) programmes have enhanced the role of the pharmacist in the provision of healthcare. In developed nations, the Pharm-D has not only increased the diversity of the curriculum but also made possible the participation of pharmacists in direct patient care. Most South Asian and South East Asian countries have also upgraded their pharmacy programmes to Pharm-D status. Such initiatives have challenged pharmacy institutions to develop new courses and teaching modules to equip future pharmacists with up-to-date clinical knowledge. However, during the design and review of curricula, certain aspects may be missed which can affect programme outcome. The aim of the current article is to identify these issues so that stakeholders can take immediate action.
Qualified staff are crucial when a pharmacy course is being designed. Qualification …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.