Article Text

Download PDFPDF
DI-011 Analysis of off-label use in biological therapies
  1. M Gutiérrez Lorenzo,
  2. D Furones Araujo,
  3. A Linares Alarcón,
  4. I Muñoz Castillo
  1. Hospital Regional de Málaga, Pharmacy, Málaga, Spain


Background Biologics are usually prescribed off-label in severe immune mediated inflammatory diseases. Unfortunately, off-label prescription is sometimes hampered in these diseases due to a lack of evidence of effectiveness.

Purpose To assess the risk and outcome of biological therapies on off-label practices in the pharmacy department of a tertiary hospital.

Material and methods This study included all patients treated between January 2014 and June 2016 with an off-label biological prescription. The data were collected from the clinical history of the patients and from the pharmacy programmes: athos, prisma and cafydim. We analysed the following variables: treatment time, doses, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and previous/subsequent treatments. Treatment repercussion were evaluated. The data were analysed through a statistical descriptive study.

Results A total of 5 types of off-label biologics were requested and administered to 30 patients for 9 different diseases.

In 80% (24) of cases the patient had been treated previously with corticosteroids and/or methotrexate. In 20% (6), the previous treatment was a biologic (not off-label prescription). Most of the prescriptions were adalimumab: 20 (67%), of which 8 (40%) were treatment for Behcet’s syndrome, 5 (25%) for uveitis in children, 5 (25%) for sarcoidosis (1 of whom was a child of 11 years old), 1 (5%) for mesenteric panniculitis and 1 (5%) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). All other prescriptions were: 2 golimumab for synovitis and sarcoidosis, 2 tocilizumab for SLE, 1 anakinra for familial Mediterranean fever, 3 ustekinumab for enteritis, Crohn’s disease and Wegener’s granulomatosis, and 2 certolizumab for uveitis and enteritis. Only for 1 patient (3.3%) was treatment not effective: adalimumab for sarcoidosis, moreover it produced ADRs (increased morning stiffness and pain in joints) after 30 months so the patient returned to methotrexate monotherapy. 9 (30%) patients developed ADRs: 6 from adalimumab (of which 3 were in children), the remaining 3 ADRs were from golimumab, tocilizumab and anakinra treatment. All were mild/moderate and were not grounds for treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion In our assessment, off-label biological therapies were effective in most patients (96.6%) and were safe (70%). Evaluation of the cost of off-label biological therapies, in terms of medication risk and cost to healthcare, will be essential to their widespread clinical utility.

No conflict of interest

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.