Article Text

Download PDFPDF

6ER-011 Modelling the impact of discounts on the real-life cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in spain
  1. E Apol1,
  2. M Delgado Perala2
  1. 1Leo Pharma, Patient Access, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. 2Leo Pharma, Patient Access Iberia, Barcelona, Spain


Background Biologic therapies represent a significant advance in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. However, these therapies come at a high cost, making evaluation and comparison of each therapies’ cost-effectiveness crucial to ensure effective allocation of resources.

Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies in plaque psoriasis by taking real-world evidence (RWE) on discontinuation and dose adjustment into account in Spain. In addition, the study looked to assess the impact of different levels of discounts on cost-effectiveness.

Material and methods A model was developed which incorporated the probability of treatment discontinuation and dose adjustment with brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab over 2 years. The probability of discontinuation and dose adjustment in each case was calculated every 4 weeks based on a literature review of RWE. For brodalumab and ixekizumab, a discontinuation rate of 1% per 4 weeks was assumed in the base case as no RWE is currently available. The effectiveness of each treatment was based on a network meta-analysis. Only direct costs of therapy were considered (list prices). Sensitivity analyses was conducted with different levels of discounts. Cost-effectiveness was assessed as the cost per patient with complete clearance (PASI 100).

Results The modern anti-IL-17 biologic therapies were highly cost-effective compared to the anti-TNFs and anti-IL-12/23. In the base case analysis, the average cost per PASI 100 responder was highest for etanercept at €526,800, followed by ustekinumab (€154,170), adalimumab (€137,511), infliximab (€125,467), secukinumab (€88,100), ixekizumab (€68,467) and brodalumab (€62,165), respectively. Sensitivity analyses indicated that discounts of approximately 80% for etanercept, 40% for ustekinumab, 35% for adalimumab and 30% for infliximab, respectively, were necessary in order to achieve similar levels of cost-effectiveness as secukinumab, whereas discounts as high as 90% for etanercept, 60% for ustekinumab, 55% for adalimumab and 50% for infliximab were necessary to reach similar levels of cost-effectiveness as ixekizumab and brodalumab.

Conclusion According to this economic model, modern anti-IL-17s are highly cost-effective compared to anti-TNFs and anti-IL-12/23. Though discounts may be a way of making anti-TNFs and anti-IL-12/23 more cost-effective, this study indicates that very high levels of discounts would be necessary to achieve this.

References and/or acknowledgements None.

Conflict of interest Corporate-sponsored research or other substantive relationships: employee at LEO Pharma.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.