Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
An odyssey across Europe
  1. Anastasia Vrana1,
  2. Andre Rieutord1,
  3. Benoit Hue2
  1. 1 Département de Pharmacie Clinique, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, Île-de-France, France
  2. 2 Service de Pharmacie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, Bretagne, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anastasia Vrana, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France; anastasia.vrana{at}gustaveroussy.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The hospital pharmacists’ mobility across the European Union (EU) has been a recurrent subject matter. The ambiguity in the recognition of professional qualifications has previously discouraged many pharmacists wishing to gain valuable experience across the EU, widen their perspective, and eventually raise practice standards by sharing their expertise. The publication of the Labour Mobility Report1 and its support towards the development of a Common Training Framework (CTF)2 has undoubtedly raised hopes for the possibility of lifting the barriers currently imposed by each country’s legal framework.

But how do individual countries currently facilitate the hospital pharmacist’s recognition of qualifications?

In France, the hospital pharmacist’s professional qualification is a well-defined 9-year pathway,3–5 resulting in a professional registration which is distinct …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @anastasia_vrana

  • Contributors All authors have contributed equally to this submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.