Article Text

Download PDFPDF

4CPS-251 Evaluation of Clostridium difficile infection management prior to implementation of a protocol for improvement
Free
  1. V Acín Garcés1,
  2. JM Vinuesa Hernando2,
  3. R Gracia Piquer2,
  4. R Fresquet Molina2,
  5. E Morte Romea3,
  6. M Gimeno2,
  7. C Seral García4,
  8. M Arenere Mendoza2
  1. 1Universidad De Zaragoza, Medicine Faculty, Zaragoza, Spain
  2. 2Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Pharmacy, Zaragoza, Spain
  3. 3Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Infectious Diseases, Zaragoza, Spain
  4. 4Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Microbiology, Zaragoza, Spain

Abstract

Background and importance Clostridium difficile disease (CDD) is the leading cause of infectious diarrhoea in the hospital environment.

Aim and objectives The objective was to evaluate the characteristics of patients with CDD prior to the implementation of a checklist for the diagnosis and treatment of CDD.

Material and methods This was a retrospective observational study of CDD cases in a third level hospital during 2019. Positive cases were evaluated according to the checklist: vulnerability (cancer, neutropenic, transplant, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or prolonged antibiotic treatment), severity (according to leucocytosis, renal function or presence of hypotension, shock or ileus), risk of recurrence (according to age, CDD the previous year, positive toxin or persistence of diarrhoea on the fifth day of treatment), treatment and antibiotic intake in the previous 3 months.

Results 126 cases of CDD were identified in 100 patients, with a median age of 76 (1–96), and 59% were women. 19.8% of the cases were vulnerable (5 transplants, 3 IBD, 8 oncological and 1 immunosuppressed). Severity of the episodes was assessed in 116 patients, with 62.9% not serious, 31.9% serious and 5.2% (6) fulminant. The fulminant cases were hypotension/shock (4) and megacolon (2). The risk of recurrence was high in 10.8%, intermediate in 55.0% and low in 34.2%. Of the 100 patients diagnosed, 21% (21) presented with at least one recurrence and 4% (4) with multiple recurrences. In addition, 7% had some episodes in the previous years. Regarding treatment of the 126 episodes of CDD: 20.6% were treated with metronidazole, 58.7% with vancomycin (8.7% followed by vancomycin taper), 7.2% with metronidazole+vancomycin, 3.9% with fidaxomycin, 3.2% with metronidazole+vancomycin+fidaxomycin, 0.8% with metronidazole+fidaxomycin, 0.8% with vancomycin+fidaxomycin and 4.8% were not treated as they were considered to be self-limiting processes. In 82.5%, the patient received at least one antibiotic in the previous 3 months.

Conclusion and relevance Patients with CDD were older (76 years). Despite the low vulnerability of the population, severe and fulminant cases reached almost 40%. Treatment was heterogeneous, but metronidazole and vancomycin remained the standard of care. In 82% of cases, patients had received prior antibiotic treatment, an aspect of particular relevance to the future management of CDD, as 21% of patients presented with recurrence.

Conflict of interest No conflict of interest

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.