Article Text

Download PDFPDF

4CPS-098 Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir effectiveness analysis and interaction profile analysis
  1. JM Caselles Gil,
  2. C Puivecino Moreno,
  3. Y Castellanos Clemente,
  4. M García Gil
  1. Hospital Universitario De Fuenlabrada, Pharmacy, Fuenlabrada, Spain


Background and Importance New drugs have been investigated with the aim of preventing serious pathology in high-risk patients with COVID. As a result, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir emerged, approved by the European Medicines Agency in December 2021 thanks to the pivotal EPIC-HR clinical trial.

Aim and Objectives To analyse the effectiveness and pharmacological interaction profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in patients diagnosed with SARS-Cov2.

Material and Methods Retrospective study in which patients diagnosed with mild-moderate SARS-Cov2 for whom treatment with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was requested from the approval of the drug until 08/31/2022 were preselected. Patients who received treatment were included. The primary effectiveness endpoint was hospital admission or death from any cause through day 28. As a secondary variable, the profile of pharmacological interactions between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and the patients‘ medication and its management. Selection of patients, demographic and clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Excel®16.48.

Results We preselected 86 patients, 37 (43.02%) did not receive treatment. The reasons for non-indication were: patients not considered high risk 30/37 (81.08%), receiving oxygen therapy 4/37 (10.82%), >6 days of symptoms, unmanageable interactions and received remdesivir, 1/37 (2.70%) each one. Obtaining a final sample of 49 patients. Mean age was 67.5 years(SD=16) and 25(51.02%) of them were men. Indication’s reasons were: high-risk immunocompromised patients 32/49 (65.31%), vaccinated >6 months ago over 80 years with risk factor 14/49 (28.57%), unvaccinated over 80 years 2/49 (4.08%), unvaccinated over 65 years with a risk factor 1/49 (2.04%). Of these, 10/49 (20.41%) required adjustment to renal function. An event (hospital-admission or death) during the 28 days after the start of treatment was registered in 16/49 (32.65%) patients. Of these 14 (28.57%) events were hospital-admission and 2 (4.08%) deaths. We detected 77 interactions in 39/49 (79.59%) patients [2.14 interactions/patient; SD=1.42], that required: to monitor 55/77 (71.43%), suspend treatment and reintroduce it 3 days after 20/77 (25.98%) and reduce dose 2/77 (2.59%). Main therapeutic groups with interactions: statins 14/77 (18.17%), metamizole 9/77 (11.68%), calcium channel blockers 8/77 (10.38%), antidepressants 5/77 (6.49%),opioids 4/77 (5.19%), direct oral anticoagulants 4/77 (5.19%), and tamsulosin 4/77 (5.19%).

Conclusion and Relevance It seems that real-life results of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir are inferior to those obtained in the pivotal RCT, due to higher number of hospital admissions. Most patients presented interactions, which could be managed in a simple way through temporary suspension and monitoring.

Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.