Article Text

Download PDFPDF

4CPS-124 Effectiveness and safety of erenumab in a second-level hospital
  1. AB Morillo Mora,
  2. V Gonzalez Rosa,
  3. CL Muñoz Cid,
  4. JM Gonzalez-Miret Martín,
  5. M Zaragoza Rascon
  1. Hospital La Serranía De Ronda, Pharmacy, Ronda, Spain


Background and Importance Migraine is a highly disabling disease, especially in patients with high frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Migraine management is limited due to side effects and a lack of effectiveness of current available prophylactic therapies. Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody approved with a specific mechanism of action in the prevention of migraine, blocking the activity of calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), a potent vasodilator which plays a role in pain signalling activities.

Aim and Objectives To quantify patients who achieve clinical benefit with erenumab (50% reduction in monthly migraine days) and describe of erenumab safety profile in a second-level hospital.

Material and Methods Observational and retrospective study that includes all patients treated with at least three doses of erenumab in our hospital. As a limitation, it is decided to start treatment only in patients with > 8 monthly migraine days and with previous failure to at least three prophylactic drugs. The following data were collected: sex, age, previous monthly migraines days, previous non-effective prophylactic treatments, current migraines days, dose of erenumab and related adverse effects.

Results 34 patients were selected, 82.4% of whom were women and the average age was 44.5 years (s=13.1). 26.5% of patients (9 patients) had 15 or more monthly migraine days before treatment with erenumab. The average number of prophylactic treatments was 4.6 (s=1.7), and the most frequently used were amitriptyline (20.9% of patients), topiramate (19.6%), flunarizine (18.3%) and zonisamide (10.5%). 73.5% of patients (25 patients) achieved clinical benefit, 47.1% of them with the minimum dose of 70 mg. The remaining 9 patients of the sample abandoned treatment, 8 due to non-effectiveness and 1 due to lack of adherence. 40% of patients who achieved clinical benefit (10 patients) are just now in a phase of interruption due to a maintenance of effectiveness. Side effects: 5 patients suffered constipation, 1 paraesthesia and 1 itch at the injection site.

Conclusion and Relevance Although the patient sample offered is small, erenumab appears to be an effective and safe option for selected patients with high-frequency migraines who have exhausted traditional alternatives.

Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.