Article Text

Download PDFPDF

5PSQ-061 Current practice of paediatric off-label prescriptions in a paediatric hospital
Free
  1. N Monti Guarnieri1,
  2. E Andresciani1,
  3. AMF Garzone1,
  4. S Guglielmi1,
  5. F Mura1,
  6. L Collevecchio1,
  7. C Polidori2,
  8. A Pompilio1
  1. 1Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Sod Farmacia, Ancona, Italy
  2. 2Università degli Studi di Camerino, Scuola di Scienze del Farmaco e Prodotti della Salute, Camerino, Italy

Abstract

Background and Importance Data concerning drugs’ dose, efficacy and safety in paediatric are very limited and this gap of knowledge induces the off-label (OL) drug use. A study showed that 60% of paediatric prescriptions were OL and the main OL-drug classes were antibacterials/antiasthmatics/analgesics. Over the last 30 years the Drug-Agency has approved laws to ensure an appropriate use of OL-medications (Law 648/96, Law 94/98, Law 326/03, Law 7/9/2017).

Aim and Objectives The aim of this work was to evaluate the paediatric OL-drug use and safety in our hospital in the last 2 years according to the Law 94/98 and the Law 326/03.

Material and Methods We analysed OL-prescriptions evaluated by the Hospital-OL-Committee (HOLC) (composed by a Hospital-Pharmacist/Pharmacologist/Clinician) from January-2021/December-2022. We calculated how many paediatric patients were involved, which OL-drug was the most prescribed and for what type of disease (if rare disease according to the national-rare-disease-database), how many patients presented an Adverse-Drug-Reaction (ADR). We considered OL all the Intravenous-Immunoglobulins (IgIv) that were not prescribed according to our regional ‘Operative-Procedure-for-the-appropriate-use-of-IgIv’.

Results The HOLC evaluated 258 OL prescriptions according to the Law 94/98 and 69 (27%) administered to 49 paediatric patients (two patients received two OL-drugs). 25 different OL-drugs were used to treat 33 conditions (20 rare diseases); seven drugs(28%) did not have the paediatric license. The most prescribed OL drug (second-level ATC) was J06-Immune-Serum-and-Immunoglobulins (20%) represented by IgIv to treat Idiopathic-Dermatomyositis/Giant-cell-Hepatitis with Autoimmune-Haemolytic-Anemia/Chronic-Polyradiculoneuritis (with or without anti-MOG antibodies)/Autoimmune-Encephalitis/Rasmussen-Syndrome/Opsoclone-Myoclone-Syndrome followed by L01-Cytostatic (17,5%) represented by bevacizumab to treat glioma and L04-immunosuppressant (17,5%) represented by adalimumab to treat Bechet-Syndrome/Systemic-Vasculitis. In the same period six patients received OL drugs according to the Law 326/03 and 4(67%) were paediatric. Three OL-drugs were used to treat two rare conditions: two patients received ivacaftor/tezacaftor/elexacaftor+ivacaftor to treat cystic-fibrosis and two fenfluramine to treat Dravet-Syndrome. Four ADRs referred to four OL therapies were reported in four paediatric patients induced by Ponatinib, IgIv, Arsenic-Trioxide, Rituximab.

Conclusion and Relevance The paediatric OL drug use in a common practice and over the last 30 years several strategies were adopted to guarantee an early and safe access to paediatric OL-medications. For example in our hospital, since 2007, all drugs included in the Hospital-Therapeutic-Formulary can be prescribed (without the HOLC’s evaluation) if they are on-label for indication but off-label for age/dosage/frequency.

Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.