Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cost-minimisation analysis of rectal cancer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy based on fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil)
  1. Sergio Marin1,2,
  2. Laia Pérez-Cordón1,
  3. Francesc Salvà3,
  4. Marcel·la Camps4,
  5. Lluís Campins1,
  6. Pilar Lianes3
  1. 1Pharmacy Department, Hospital de Mataró, Mataró, Spain
  2. 2Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  3. 3Oncology Department, Hospital de Mataró, Mataró, Spain
  4. 4Pharmacy Department, Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia, Igualada, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sergio Marin, Pharmacy Department, Hospital de Mataró, Mataró 08916, Spain; Sergiomarinrubio{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives The current standard treatment for patients with rectal cancer stage II–III is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be performed with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine (CPC) considered to be equivalent therapies. Medication cost is higher for CPC than for 5-FU, however, the administration of continuous 5-FU intravenous infusion is related to other costs such as those associated with outpatient facilities or central venous catheter insertion.

Methods This retrospective study analysed the direct sanitary costs associated with the treatments and their complications from a hospital perspective. Costs in patients treated with 5-FU or CPC were measured between January 2010 and July 2018 at Mataró Hospital. The aim of this study was to perform a cost-minimisation analysis between the two treatments. We aimed to assess the cost associated with the complications related to each drug and the economic impact of applying the most efficient option.

Results Ninety-eight patients were analysed: 32 were treated with CPC and 66 with 5-FU. Treatment cost was significantly higher for 5-FU than for CPC (2560.86±99.17 and 563.10±9.52 respectively, P=0.0001). No significant differences were found in the costs associated with treatment complications between groups (148.21±934.91 and 41.41±102.50 euros respectively, P=0.322).

Conclusions Considering the clinical equivalence shown in the available trials and previous reviews, the most efficient treatment is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CPC. Complications associated with the treatments did not significantly modify these results. Other studies gave similar results both in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant context, reaffirmed in this study.

  • health economics
  • pharmacoeconomics
  • chemotherapy
  • oncology
  • gastrointestinal tumours
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.