Article Text

Prescription profile in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised in Aragon, Spain
Free
  1. Adriana Alvarez,
  2. Laura Cabia,
  3. Cristina Trigo,
  4. Ana Cristina Bandrés,
  5. María Bestué
  1. Autonomic Coordination Unit for Rational use of Drugs and Health Products of Aragon, Healthcare General Management, Health Department, Aragon Government, Zaragoza, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Laura Cabia, Autonomic Coordination Unit for Rational use of Drugs and Health Products of Aragon, 50017 Zaragoza, Spain; lauracabia{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction On 14 March 2020, a state of alarm was declared in Spain because of the pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). After 12 weeks from the beginning of the pandemic, the number of confirmed cases stoods at 5781 in Aragon: 46% hospitalised, 5% admitted to intensive care unit, and 15% died. The absence of controlled trials in SARS-CoV-2 infection and the fast progression of the disease has promoted the use of treatments with unproven potential benefit. The objective of this study is to define the prescription profile in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised in Aragon, Spain during the pandemic and its adaptation to the official recommendations.

Patients and methods Descriptive retrospective study of the consumption and inpatient dispensation of drugs in a sample of COVID-19 infected inpatients (with positive PCR test result) admitted to hospitals of Aragon, between 1 March and 8 May 2020. Data were collected by an inpatient dispensation software program.

Results 1482 positive COVID-19 patients were analysed: 54.9% male, median age 75 years (IQR 62–85); 12% were admitted to the intensive care unit. Median prescription: 13 active ingredients per patient (IQR 9–19). 73% (1093 patients) received hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, or azithromycin, 81% as combination therapy. 4.3% (52) received other antivirals. 46% received corticosteroids (84% methylprednisolone, 8.7% dexamethasone) and 2.2% tocilizumab.

Discussion At the time of the study period there was not enough quality evidence to issue a recommendation on any treatment. There are several clinical trials ongoing to clarify what is the best treatment for patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

  • case reports
  • complementary therapies
  • emergency medicine
  • safety
  • documentation
  • evidence-based medicine

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information, de-identified participant data.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information, de-identified participant data.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.