Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Assessing health outcomes: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology
  1. Mikel Urretavizcaya1,
  2. Karen Álvarez2,
  3. Olatz Olariaga1,
  4. Maria Jose Tames1,
  5. Ainhoa Asensio1,
  6. Gerardo Cajaraville1,
  7. Ana Cristina Riestra1,3
    1. 1Pharmacy Department, Onkologikoa, San Sebastian, País Vasco, Spain
    2. 2Pharmacy Department, Nuestra Senora de la Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canarias, Spain
    3. 3Medicine Department, University of Deusto, Bilbao, País Vasco, Spain
    1. Correspondence to Mikel Urretavizcaya, Pharmacy Department, Onkologikoa, San Sebastian, País Vasco, Spain; urretabizkaia.mikel{at}gmail.com

    Abstract

    Purpose This study investigates the clinical impact of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring apps/web interfaces, aimed at symptom-management, in cancer patients undergoing outpatient systemic antineoplastic treatment. Additionally, it explores the advantages offered by these applications, including their functionalities and healthcare team-initiated follow-up programmes.

    Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using a predefined search strategy in MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary studies assessing symptom burden through at-home ePRO surveys in adult cancer patients receiving outpatient systemic antineoplastic treatment, whenever health outcomes were evaluated. Exclusion criteria excluded telemedicine-based interventions other than ePRO questionnaires and non-primary articles or study protocols. To evaluate the potential bias in the included studies, an exhaustive quality assessment was conducted, as an additional inclusion filter.

    Results Among 246 identified articles, 227 were excluded for non-compliance with inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 19 articles, only eight met the rigorous validity assessment and were included for detailed examination and data extraction, presented in attached tables.

    Conclusion This review provides compelling evidence of ePRO monitoring’s positive clinical impact across diverse cancer settings, encompassing various cancer types, including early and metastatic stages. These systems are crucial in enabling timely interventions and reducing communication barriers, among other functionalities. While areas for future ePRO innovation are identified, the primary limitation lies in comparing clinical outcomes of reviewed articles, due to scale variability and study population heterogeneity. To conclude, our results reaffirm the transformative potential of ePRO apps in oncology and their pivotal role in shaping the future of cancer care.

    • Patient Reported Outcomes
    • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
    • Antineoplastic agents
    • MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
    • Quality of Life
    • Outcome Assessment, Health Care

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. As this study is a systematic review, no new data were generated or analysed. All data used in this review are publicly available in the cited sources, and the comprehensive list of references is provided in the manuscript. The authors confirm that they had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. As this study is a systematic review, no new data were generated or analysed. All data used in this review are publicly available in the cited sources, and the comprehensive list of references is provided in the manuscript. The authors confirm that they had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

    View Full Text