PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - J. Gallardo-Anciano AU - A. Marauri-Baños AU - F. Bonachia-Caballero AU - M.J. Aza-Pascual-Salcedo AU - C. Saenz-Pastor AU - C. Borra-Ruiz AU - M. Blazquez-Bea AU - M.T. Barajas-Santos TI - Comprehensive review of pharmacological treatment in polymedicated elders AID - 10.1136/ejhpharm-2012-000074.101 DP - 2012 Apr 01 TA - European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice PG - 123--123 VI - 19 IP - 2 4099 - http://ejhp.bmj.com/content/19/2/123.1.short 4100 - http://ejhp.bmj.com/content/19/2/123.1.full SO - Eur J Hosp Pharm2012 Apr 01; 19 AB - Background The progressive ageing of the population with associated polymedication is an emergent problem of funding and safety. Many drugs handled by general practitioners (GPs) are initiated by specialists. Purpose To report on the results of a system used in a health centre in which hospital pharmacists review patients' drug treatments in order to improve prescribing and use of drugs in polymedicated older patients. Materials and methods Reviewing criteria: >75-year-old patients with >6 prescribed medicines. Hospital pharmacists reviewed primary care (PC) and specialist care (SC) clinical histories and prepared a report, including recommendations, on indication, dose, regimen, duration, interactions, duplications, fulfilment of therapeutic goals, monitoring of adverse effects, dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency, more efficient alternatives, suitability based on STOPP/START criteria and adherence. The doctors were invited to change the prescriptions in the light of this information. View this table:GRP101 Table 1 Treatment modifications Results Study period: March to September 2011. 31 patients were followed up. Mean age: 83 years (76–99), drugs before the review: 8.9 per patient (pp) (6–15), drugs after: 8.1 pp (0–14), pharmacy recommendations: six pp, 57.1% accepted by the physician, €1500 annual savings. Conclusions A review of the complete treatment was a valid method, since it detected unnecessary medicines, points of improvement in prescribing and resulted in money saved. The hospital pharmacist collated the drug treatments generated by PC and SC which helped in decision making during the prescription process.