RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 5PSQ-035 Mass uniformity of hard capsules: royal Spanish pharmacopoeia vs United States pharmacopoeia
JF European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
JO Eur J Hosp Pharm
FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group
SP A213
OP A214
DO 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.441
VO 30
IS Suppl 1
A1 Prieto Román, S
A1 Barrueco Fernández, N
A1 Álvaro Alonso, EA
A1 Such Díaz, A
A1 Esteban Alba, C
A1 De Agustín SIERRA, L
A1 Montero Pastor, B
A1 López Guerra, L
A1 Santiago Pérez, A
A1 Pedraza Nieto, L
A1 Escobar Rodríguez, I
YR 2023
UL http://ejhp.bmj.com/content/30/Suppl_1/A213.2.abstract
AB Background and Importance Quality control (QC) is an important part of the quality assurance of the elaborating process in a Hospital-Pharmacy-Department (HPD).The mass uniformity is the most commonly procedure used for QC of hard-capsules.Aim and Objectives Analyse comparatively the Royal-Spanish-Pharmacopoeia (RSP) hard-capsule mass uniformity method versus the United-States-Pharmacopoeia (USP).Material and Methods The following parameters of each method were analysed: sample, average reference weight, percentage and acceptance requirements. Also, the elaborating process necessary to apply each method.Finally, the elaboration of a batch of 100 hard-capsules of dexamethasone 40mg according to the HPD Standard-Operating-Procedure was taken as a reference. Then the elaborations were retrospectively reviewed from February-2020 to February-2021.The QC had been carried out with the RSP-method and the USP-method was then applied. For this, the theoretical weight of a capsule was calculated taking the average weight of 5 empty capsules (0.0493g) as reference and the weight of the batch content (13.8g=dexamethasone (4g) + excipient (9.8g)) calculated in the compounding design being the acceptance interval 0.169–0.206g.Results The RSP-method requires a sample of 20 capsules and uses their average weight as a reference, while the USP-method requires a sample of 5% or 10 capsules (whichever is less) and uses the theoretical weight of a capsule as a reference. The RSP-method admits a deviation of ± 10% or ± 7.5% depending on the average weight; and no >2 capsules can deviate from the limits and none more than double. The USP-method accepts a limit of ± 10% respect to the theoretical weight, and no capsule must deviate.Regarding the compounding method, the RSP allows elaboration by volumetric filling according to the Spanish-National-Formulary (excipients weight is not required). However, the USP-method requires knowing the theoretical capsule weight, which implies weighing the excipients.Since February-2020 to February-2021, 8 batches of dexamethasone 40mg were elaborated. They were accepted with the RFE-method. After applying the USP-method, none were rejected.Conclusion and Relevance The USP-method is safer than the RSP-method because for the same acceptance interval ( ± 10%) it does not admit any deviation. It also requires knowing the weight of all the excipients. Therefore, it is capable of detecting errors in the elaboration that the RFE-method would not detect (as long as the error is >10% and the capsules are homogeneous).Currently, the USP-method has been incorporated in the HPD as a reference of hard capsules QC, since it provides greater safety in their preparation.Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest.