Table 3

Study of the detection of visible particles in 10 mL type I moulded glass vials by three methods including manual, semi-automated performed by two operators (#1, #2) and automated visual inspection devices

Operating conditionVialsVisible particles inspection
ManualSemi-automatedAutomated
#1#2#1#2
No cleanroom ISO 9
Woven cotton/polyester unsterile outfit without gloves
Unwashed and unwrapped
 Vial 5.1 to 5.5BadBadBadBad5 Bad – 0 Good
Cleanroom D ISO 8
Unwoven carbon/polyester sterile cleanroom outfit with sterile gloves
Washed and unwrapped
 Vial 6.1GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 6.2GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 6.3GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 6.4GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 6.5BadBadBadBad5 Bad – 0 Good
Cleanroom D ISO 8
Unwoven cellulose/polyester sterile cleanroom outfit with sterile gloves
Washed, depyrogenated and unwrapped
 Vial 7.1GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 7.2GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 7.3GoodGoodGoodGood1 Good – 4 Bad
 Vial 7.4BadBadBadBad5 Bad – 0 Good
 Vial 7.5BadBadBadBad5 Bad – 0 Good
Cleanroom C ISO 7
Unwoven carbon/polyester sterile cleanroom outfit with sterile gloves
Washed and wrapped
 Vial 8.1GoodGoodGoodGood5 Good – 0 Bad
 Vial 8.2GoodGoodGoodGood4 Good – 1 Bad
 Vial 8.3BadBadBadBad5 Bad – 0 Good
 Vial 8.4BadBadBadBad5 Bad – 0 Good
 Vial 8.5BadBadBadBad2 Bad – 3 Good
  • Good: No defect detected.

  • Bad: One or more defects detected.

  • For the washed vials, one set was bagged, the other was filled directly at the end of washing. The vials were successfully inspected five times by an automated visual inspection device.