Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Using machine learning or deep learning models in a hospital setting to detect inappropriate prescriptions: a systematic review
  1. Erin Johns1,2,
  2. Ahmad Alkanj3,
  3. Morgane Beck1,
  4. Laurent Dal Mas1,
  5. Benedicte Gourieux3,4,
  6. Erik-André Sauleau2,5,
  7. Bruno Michel3,4
  1. 1Direction de la Qualité, de la Performance et de l’Innovation, Agence Régionale de Santé Grand Est Site de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France
  2. 2IMAGeS, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie, Illkirch, Grand Est, France
  3. 3Laboratoire de Pharmacologie et de Toxicologie Neurocardiovasculaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France
  4. 4Service Pharmacie – Stérilisation, Les Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France
  5. 5Département de Santé Publique – Groupe Méthodes Recherche Clinique, Les Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Erin Johns, Direction de la Qualité, de la Performance et de l’Innovation, Agence Régionale de Santé Grand Est Site de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Grand Est, France; erin.johns{at}etu.unistra.fr

Abstract

Objectives The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is catching the interest of hospital pharmacists. A massive collection of health data is now available to train AI models and hold the promise of disrupting codes and practices. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the state of the art of machine learning or deep learning models that detect inappropriate hospital medication orders.

Methods A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2023. Studies were included if they reported and described an AI model intended for use by clinical pharmacists in hospitals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).

Results 13 articles were selected after review: 12 studies were judged to have high risk of bias; 11 studies were published between 2020 and 2023; 8 were conducted in North America and Asia; 6 analysed orders and detected inappropriate prescriptions according to patient profiles and medication orders; and 7 detected specific inappropriate prescriptions, such as detecting antibiotic resistance, dosage abnormality in prescriptions, high alert drugs errors from prescriptions or predicting the risk of adverse drug events. Various AI models were used, mainly supervised learning techniques. The training datasets used were very heterogeneous; the length of study varied from 2 weeks to 7 years and the number of prescription orders analysed went from 31 to 5 804 192.

Conclusions This systematic review points out that, to date, few original research studies report AI tools based on machine or deep learning in the field of hospital clinical pharmacy. However, these original articles, while preliminary, highlighted the potential value of integrating AI into clinical hospital pharmacy practice.

  • CLINICAL PHARMACY
  • PHARMACY SERVICE, HOSPITAL
  • Hospital Distribution Systems
  • Medical Informatics
  • MEDICATION SYSTEMS, HOSPITAL

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.